Current:Home > MarketsWoman files lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting customers' biometric data -ProgressCapital
Woman files lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting customers' biometric data
View
Date:2025-04-17 22:18:34
An Illinois woman has filed a lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting and storing her and other customers' biometric data through facial recognition technology and other means without their consent.
The lawsuit, filed March 11 in a Cook County circuit court and published by local outlet Fox 32, alleges Target's surveillance systems covertly collect things like face and fingerprint scans from customers as part of its anti-theft efforts. The alleged practice violates Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, the lawsuit contends, a law the state legislature passed in 2008 to protect people from details of their physical characteristics being collected without their knowledge.
"Target does not notify customers of this fact prior to store entry, nor does it obtain consent prior to collecting its customers’ Biometric Data," according to the lawsuit.
Target did not immediately respond Tuesday morning to USA TODAY's request for comment.
What is biometric data and how does BIPA protect Illinois residents' privacy?
Biometric information comprises data on a range of a person's physical characteristics, including retina or iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, hand scans, facial geometry and DNA.
Illinois' biometric privacy act, better known as BIPA, makes it unlawful for private companies to use facial recognition technology to identify and track such information without people's consent, according to the state's American Civil Liberties Union.
The law also requires companies to specify how the information would be retained and when it would be destroyed.
In 2022, the social media app Snapchat was sued over an alleged violation of BIPA pertaining to the data collected from users who used features likes lenses and filters to take photos and videos of themselves. The company ultimately agreed to a $35 million settlement, according to the Rockford Register Star, a USA TODAY Network publication.
In the newer suit against Target, attorneys argued that the retail giant's stores across the country are outfitted with cameras and video surveillance, many of which have the capability of collecting biometric data. For at least a decade, Target has also made use of an "advanced system of electronic surveillance" at bases spread throughout the U.S., as well as two forensic labs, to "enhance video footage and analyze finger prints."
While the system is meant to detect shoplifters, the lawsuit contended that it captures any customer's face who enters the store.
"There are numerous instances of former Target employees detailing its facial recognition system circulating on the internet as well," the lawsuit said, referencing a TikTok page where customers and ex-employees discuss concerns about the system.
Amazon, Google, others also sued for biometric privacy concerns
Target is far from the first major American company to face legal action due to concerns over its biometric data collection practices
Last year, Amazon was hit with a class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to properly inform New York City customers of biometric information collection in Amazon Go stores. Amazon confirmed to USA TODAY that is used biometric data for its Amazon One "palm-based identity" payment system but denied using facial recognition technology in any of its stores.
In 2022, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Google, claiming the tech giant captured and used the state's residents' biometric data without their permission through products and services like Google Photos, Google Assistant and Nest Hub Max.
Contributing: Wyatte Grantham-Philips; Brett Molina;
Eric Lagatta covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
veryGood! (85)
Related
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Your Summer Tan Is Here: Dolce Glow's Founder on How to Get the Perfect Celeb-Loved Bronze at Home
- The Excerpt podcast: Can Jon Stewart make The Daily Show must-see TV for a new generation?
- Biden calls Alabama IVF ruling outrageous and unacceptable
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Cybersecurity breach at UnitedHealth subsidiary causes Rx delays for some pharmacies
- Johnny Manziel says father secretly tried to negotiate for $3 million from Texas A&M
- Volkswagen is recalling more than 261,000 vehicles, including some Audis and Jettas
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- China to send 2 pandas to San Diego Zoo, may send some to D.C. zoo as well
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- On decades-old taped call, Eagles manager said ‘pampered rock star’ was stalling band biography
- AP Week in Pictures: North America
- South Carolina bans inmates from in-person interviews. A lawsuit wants to change that
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Who has the power to sue Brett Favre over welfare money? 1 Mississippi Republican sues another
- ESPN's Kirk Herbstreit, Chris Fowler and more will be in EA Sports College Football video game
- What to know for WWE Elimination Chamber 2024: Date, US time, how to watch, match card
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Bobi loses title of world's oldest dog ever, after Guinness investigation
The Quantitative Trading Journey of Dashiell Soren
Two men charged in Vermont murder-for-hire case to go on trial in September
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
A former funeral home owner has been arrested after a corpse lay in a hearse for 2 years
Michigan man convicted in 2018 slaying of hunter at state park
Handwritten lyrics of Eagles' classic Hotel California the subject of a criminal trial that's about to start